[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold gets it wrong

From: Atwood, Robert C <r.atwood_at_imperial.ac.uk>
Date: 2007-10-10 13:06:56 CEST

 
> From: Mark Reibert [mailto:svn@reibert.com]
> Sent: 10 October 2007 05:31
...
> The arguments for security and pruning notwithstanding, the
> *idea* of an
> obliterate seems, well, incongruous to the very nature of a
> versioning,
> history-preserving repository.
>
I think this could be addressed by large warnings, rather than not
having the option at all! If I develop something, originally without
intent to distribute, I might include some other peoples' code or
binaries into the repo for conveniece, so that a fresh checkout will
build straight away without obtaining and installing the files.
Subsequently deciding to distribute requres removing that code, but in
*keeping* with the 'very nature of .. History preserving' it would be
nice to keep the history of the distributable project and present a
repository for distribution. OTOH, I am not to fussed if it has to be
done by dumpfilter or similar off-line utility.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Oct 10 13:08:38 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.