On Oct 9, 2007, at 07:23, Jeremy Mordkoff wrote:
> I sent this to svnbook-dev@red-bean.com but never heard back. Was
> that a waste of time?
>
>
>
> Anyways, am I off base here?
Yours sounds like a reasonable suggestion to me.
> From: Jeremy Mordkoff
> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 4:20 PM
> To: svnbook-dev@red-bean.com
> Cc: Jeremy Mordkoff
> Subject: inconsistency in the vendor branch examples
>
>
>
> In General Vendor Branch Management Procedure
> We now have the current version of the libcomplex source code in /
> vendor/libcomplex/current. Now, we tag that version (see the
> section called “Tags”) and then copy it into the main development
> branch. Our copy will create a new directory called libcomplex in
> our existing calc project directory. It is in this copied version
> of the vendor data that we will make our customizations.
>
> $ svn copy http://svn.example.com/repos/vendor/libcomplex/current
> \ http://svn.example.com/repos/vendor/libcomplex/1.0
> \ -m 'tagging libcomplex-1.0'…$ svn copy http://
> svn.example.com/repos/vendor/libcomplex/1.0 \ http://
> svn.example.com/repos/calc/libcomplex \ -m
> 'bringing libcomplex-1.0 into the main branch'…
>
>
> But later on in svn_load_dirs.pl
> You can indicate that you'd like svn_load_dirs.pl to tag the new
> vendor drop by passing the -t command-line option and specifying a
> tag name. This tag is another URL relative to the first program
> argument.
>
> $ svn_load_dirs.pl -t libcomplex-1.1
> \ http://svn.example.com/repos/vendor/libcomplex
> \ current
> \ /path/to/libcomplex-1.1…
>
>
>
>
> To be consistent with the above, shouldn’t this be just “-t 1.1”
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Oct 10 06:40:27 2007