[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Question about the state of the Python SWIG bindings

From: Brian Munroe <brian.e.munroe_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-09-04 22:09:11 CEST

This might not be the correct forum to ask this, but here goes.

In the ./subversion/bindings/swig/INSTALL file, it states that the
status of the Python SWIG bindings are:

* Python

  The Python bindings are fairly well developed, although there are some
  missing parts, most notably, there is no useful wrapping of the svn_ra APIs.

Now I am pretty much a newbie when it comes to SWIG. I understand
what it does, and have done the trivial 'hello, world' with it, but
that is about it.

I was wondering, if all SWIG does is help generate the Python bindings
from the C version, why is it missing parts? Does SWIG not do a
perfect job of wrapping the C bindings? Is that what the INSTALL is
saying?

I am thinking about using them in an upcoming project and I wanted to
identify where the shortcomings will be.

Just curious, and thanks in advance.

-- brian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Sep 4 22:06:19 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.