so, is there any way to coerce svn into working that way? ;-)
On 8/20/07, Ryan Schmidt <subversion-2007b@ryandesign.com> wrote:
>
> On Aug 20, 2007, at 14:19, Khang K Tran wrote:
>
> > my question has to do with using svn diff (v1.4.3) in the presence
> > of externally linked files. here's an example of my repo:
> >
> > - trunk
> > - core
> > - modules
> > - branches
> > - test1
> > - core (svn:externals points to trunk's core folder)
> > - modules
> >
> > let's say i check out test1 and make a change to the file foo.c in
> > core. from the top of my sandbox, i type "svn diff core/foo.c" and
> > i can see the diff, everything's fine. however, if i just type
> > "svn diff" without specifying foo.c (that is, i'm relying on the
> > default recursive behavior), then nothing shows up. it ignores the
> > diff in the core folder completely. this seems to only be the case
> > with external files because diffs in the branch-local modules
> > folder show up fine in both uses of svn diff.
> >
> > any ideas? is this known behavior? i wasn't able to find anything
> > on this in the issues mailing list.
>
> The behavior is expected. If you have changes in the external
> directory, you must commit them in the external directory. If you
> have changes outside of the main working copy, you must commit them
> there. If you have changes in both places, you must commit twice.
>
> See the book:
>
> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.4/svn.advanced.externals.html
>
> "The support that exists for externals definitions in Subversion is
> less than ideal, though. ... [T]he working copies created via the
> externals definition support are still disconnected from the primary
> working copy (on whose versioned directories the svn:externals
> property was actually set). And Subversion still only truly operates
> on non-disjoint working copies. So, for example, if you want to
> commit changes that you've made in one or more of those external
> working copies, you must run svn commit explicitly on those working
> copies—committing on the primary working copy will not recurse into
> any external ones."
>
>
>
--
khang k tran
Received on Tue Aug 21 08:47:53 2007