Re: start-commit to enforce needs-lock?

On Aug 7, 2007, at 10:57, Andy Levy wrote:

> On 8/7/07, A. M. Passy wrote:
>
>> But I notice that there is the "start-commit" hook, which happens
>> before the transaction is created. What's wrong with adding the
>> property if not present at that point?
>
> I would think the same dangers lurk here. You're still changing the
> content that's been transmitted by the client without notifying the
> client.

No, at the start-commit phase, the client has not yet transmitted any
data to the server other than the username and password, so there is
no way to affect the transaction at this point, since there isn't yet
any transaction.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Aug 8 00:17:54 2007