On Aug 6, 2007, at 08:16, Ingo Schmidt wrote:
> Following scenario:
> - I have a working copy of trunk with some local modifications
> - I now use SmartSVN feature to create a branch from the WC
> This results in one single svn action. I get a new branch which is
> an exact copy of what was in my WC
> - I do my changes in the branch
> - Now I want to merge back my changes
>
> While working on the branch, no changes were made in trunk.
>
> svn log -v on the branch gives following output:
> r1852 | xyz | 2007-07-03 11:37:30 +0200 (Di, 03 Jul 2007) | 1 line
> Changed paths:
> A /branches/test (from /trunk:1844)
> R /branches/test/bla/test1.txt (from /trunk/bla/test1.txt:1846)
> A /branches/test/bla/test2.txt (from /trunk/bla/test2.txt:1850)
>
> r1853 | xyz | 2007-07-03 12:36:30 +0200 (Di, 03 Jul 2007) | 1 line
> Changed paths:
> M /branches/test/bla/test2.txt
>
>
> Now I use:
> svn merge -r 1852:1853 svn://host/project/branches/test
>
> It is quite expected that this only merges the changes of test2.txt
> into trunk.
> However, what do I do, if I want the whole branch as it is as my new
> trunk? Or rather:
> Only what changed in my branch (including the files with status R)
> should be taken over to trunk.
>
> Probably a better way of creating the branch would have been to make a
> branch of trunk, then switch to the branch and only then commit my
> local changes.
Yes, to your last paragraph: that would have been the way to create
the branch. Since you did not do that, I do not know how to
accomplish what you want to do.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Aug 6 19:25:26 2007