[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: the obliterate discussion - why dumpfiltering is no valid workaround

From: patrick <Patrick.Wyss_at_mobilesolutions.ch>
Date: 2007-07-23 10:35:27 CEST

Andy Levy wrote:
> which means we're subject to lots of Sarbanes-Oxley review. My
> auditors would not be pleased if there was an easily-accessible way
> for people to permanently remove things from Subversion - they were
> absolutely giddy when they heard that that people (other than the
> repository admin, who needs to go to quite a bit of trouble) can't
> delete elements AND their history.
> if I lost this measure of control, their faith in my change-control
> procedures and monitoring would be shaken.

1. as pointed out by others it should be an admin only feature.
2. you have the same problem with dumpfilterload

i think we should not spend to much time on thinking about solutions that
deal with malicious admins. this is not a problem that can be solved by

View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/the-obliterate-discussion---why-dumpfiltering-is-no-valid-workaround-tf4116918.html#a11739725
Sent from the Subversion Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jul 23 10:34:29 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.