[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: the obliterate discussion - why dumpfiltering is no valid workaround

From: Toby Thain <toby_at_smartgames.ca>
Date: 2007-07-21 23:33:35 CEST

On 21-Jul-07, at 2:13 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:

> Toby Thain wrote:
>>>
>>> But there are situations where one does want real obliterate: many
>>> corporations need the ability to remove a document from version
>>> control completely because they were never supposed to have had
>>> it in
>>> the first place (i.e., legal concerns).
>> So you'd have to eliminate all backups too...
>
> Only if you want to stay out of jail.

Mark Phippard hints at some other shortcomings of 'obliterate' in his
blog,
http://blogs.open.collab.net/svn/2007/07/second-chances-.html

For instance, a problematic/offensive/illegal commit could well be
logged in many places, and the data in question may well exist in
many working copies. It might be very hard to put the genie back in
the bottle. (To which inevitably someone will respond, "so you're
saying we shouldn't even try?")

--T

>
> --
> Les Mikesell
> lesmikesell@gmail.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Jul 21 23:32:41 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.