[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Revision numbers as MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH?

From: Rob Hawkes <rob.hawkes_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-07-02 01:43:00 CEST

Thank you for pointing that out, It looks like I'll stick with the SVN
way of doing things then.

On 02/07/07, Andy Levy <andy.levy@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please remember to use Reply To All so discussion stays on-list.
>
> On 7/1/07, Rob Hawkes <rob.hawkes@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thank you for replying.
> >
> > The reasoned I asked is I wanted to know how people like phpBB and
> > Drupal managed to get the revision number to display differently.
> >
> > Here are their $Id$ outputs respectively.
> >
> > $Id: index.php,v 1.172 2007/06/11 00:11:02 acydburn Exp $
> >
> > $Id: install.php,v 1.34 2007/01/10 10:15:07 unconed Exp $
> >
> > As you can see, they use the major.minor version numbering.
>
> These projects appear to use CVS, not Subversion.
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jul 2 01:43:08 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.