On 5/9/07, david x callaway <dxc@pobox.com> wrote:
> if you look at "all the possible solutions available", you will never
> choose because there are at least dozens and maybe more. my advice is
> to evaluate systems until you find at most 3 that meet your known needs
> (including future), then stop looking and pick one. unless you are
> really, really special I don't think it would be difficult to come up
> with three good candidates.
>
> I'll even seed the flamewar: look at git, svn and perforce. like
> gigantic systems that require multiple adminstrators? substitute
> clearcase for one of the above. don't care about atomic commits and
> speed of remote diffing? substitute cvs for one of the above.
i'd be quite happy with SVN, and i think we could build a successful
process around it. unfortunately it looks like management wants
process in a box, which is particularly frustrating because then the
developers have very little say in the process. we (the developers)
know the current process is broken and would really like to be
involved in fixing it. but we don't currently have an argument that
will persuade management...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu May 10 15:31:21 2007