Re: Efficiency of update after renames

Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to> writes:
> I recently noticed that updates after a rename of a large file are not handled
> very efficiently. Instead of using the local copy already present on my hard
> drive, a new copy is downloaded from the server.
>
> I looked on the issue list and didn't see the issue listed.
>
> Is this a known issue? If so, can you tell me the issue number?
>
> If not, is this because the developers don't consider it to be an issue?
> (i.e. I shouldn't bother creating an entry in the issue tracker for it.)

We're aware of it :-). No plans to fix it right now, though patches
welcome of course.

-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 24 05:43:32 2007