[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Code Loss!?

From: Dmitri Colebatch <dim_at_colebatch.com>
Date: 2007-04-16 23:23:53 CEST


On 4/16/07, Irvine, Chuck R [EQ] <Chuck.R.Irvine@embarq.com> wrote:
> > Is this something that might be covered/coverable in the
> > merge tracking functionality?
> As far as been indicated on the mailing list, no this won't be addressed
> in the merge tracking initiaitve. The most current information is that
> fixing this problem will be considered for inclusion in 1.6.

Thanks - can I ask one further question (we've only been using
Subversion for a few months, having come across from CVS). My
understanding is that Subversion has no distinction between a file
that has been copied, and a file that has been renamed. In both cases
the new file is simply a file that has inherited history. Is this

The reason I ask is that I think there is a difference. The main one
being the difference between creating a branch, and renaming a file on
that branch. I assume the lack of distinction between these two
activities is the reason why this functionality is missing. Correct?


To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Apr 16 23:24:16 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.