Re: rm -> ci -> cp bug?

On 2007-04-05 18:08:27 -0700, Miller, Eric wrote:
> Sorry, I forgot to enumerate that step:
>
> svn del <dir>
> svn ci -m '' <dir>
> svn st -uN <----- shows *no* changes, nothing missing
> svn cp . <tag url> <----- fails with 'missing <dir>' error.
>
> There is a bug *somewhere* in there.

Yes, there seems to be an inconsistency. For instance, if you do a
"svn mkdir <dir>" instead of a svn del, then the svn cp does not fail
and the new directory is taken into account in the tag URL. So,
shouldn't the behavior be similar in the case of a svn del?

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent_at_vinc17.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org