On 2/20/07, karl.kornel@mindspeed.com <karl.kornel@mindspeed.com> wrote:
> "Ed Hillmann" <ed.hillmann@gmail.com> wrote on 02/18/2007 03:43:38 PM:
>
> > <<<snip>>>
> >
> > From what I can tell, process 19688 was what was originally started.
> > And process 13863 was spawned from the original process.
> >
> > Is this OK? Should I kill these off and start again? Or is it normal
> > for svnserve to spawn off child processes.
> >
> > <<<snip>>>
>
> With a quick check of some of svnserve's source code, it appears
> that it can handle all three options: Forking off a process for each
> connection, spinning off a thread for each connection, or remaining
> single-threaded and handling connections on at a time.
Thanks Karl. I'll leave it alone then, and not worry about it. In
fact, now that I look again, it's back down to the one daemon process.
I can go back to letting SVN do its thing (which it has been doing
for us quite nicely :) ).
Thanks again for the insight. I wouldn't have know where to look in the code.
Ed
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Feb 20 02:09:02 2007