Hi Ryan:
Thx for the suggestion.
However, the file exists in all revisions from HEAD back to when it was
added. Shouldn't that be good enough for the -r 127892 formulation of the
command to work? svn doesn't need a hint to find this incarnation of the
file in that place with that name ...
Anyway, I searched the logs with -v, and this file has never existed and
been deleted in any previous revisions, so the PEG formulation shouldn't be
requried (but it is).
Also, I completed an svnadmin verify of this repo and it did not report any
errors.
Any more ideas out there?
T.
On 2/15/07, Ryan Schmidt <subversion-2007a@ryandesign.com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 15, 2007, at 12:53, Tim Noell wrote:
>
> > The "file@rev" (PEG revision) formulation seems to work for these
> > files. e.g.,
> > galaxy 0 ~% svn ls -r 127892 https://mls:8043/mls3/lf/futures/next/
> > branches/StrikerEng/archives/eea/thineng/Striker/apps/
> > colorcal_app_align.c
> > svn: REPORT request failed on '/mls3/!svn/bc/129661/lf/futures/next/
> > branches/StrikerEng/archives/eea/thineng/Striker/apps/
> > colorcal_app_align.c'
> > svn: File not found: revision 127478, path '/lf/futures/next/wip/
> > thineng/Striker/apps/colorcal_app_align.c'
> >
> > fails, while:
> >
> > galaxy 1 ~% svn ls https://mls:8043/mls3/lf/futures/next/branches/
> > StrikerEng/archives/eea/thineng/Striker/apps/
> > colorcal_app_align.c@127892
> > colorcal_app_align.c
> >
> > succeeds.
> >
> > Howeverr, this file exists in all revisions from when it was
> > created (r127892) up to and including HEAD. So, the
> > "file@rev" (PEG) formulation shouldn't be needed, right?
> >
> > Even if file@rev formulation is needed, the behaviour is
> > inconsistent between the files that were added at the same time
> > (r127892). .buildname and colorcal_app_align.h are fine with
> > either form, while colorcal_app_align.c, colorcal_app_rto.h and
> > colorcal_app_rto.c only work with the file@rev formulation, yet all
> > files were created in the repo at the same time.
>
> Sounds like Subversion doesn't think those files' histories are
> continuous. Have those files been deleted and re-added at some point?
> You may want to check the complete log of those files, with the -v
> option, to see what's been happening with them.
>
>
> --
>
> To reply to the mailing list, please use your mailer's Reply To All
> function
>
>
>
--
// "Only dead fish go with the flow"
Received on Thu Feb 15 23:31:07 2007