[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Fwd: Re: Poor performance in windows. Switching back to CVS]

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-02-15 16:51:43 CET

Mike Brenner wrote:
> My teams and I often take work home for the weekend
> then go through the hassle of attempting to check
> them back in on Monday -- it would be cool
> if svn could handle this use case more easily,
> and recover from the unnecessary conflicts
> more easily.

It should be extremely rare, even if theoretically possible to have an
incorrect file timestamp that accidentally exactly matches the
unmodified version of the file. Is this a real problem or are you
having some other kind of conflict? If you take the whole working copy
including the .svn directories, perhaps the timestamps are being changed
on the unmodified pristine copies.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@gmail.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Feb 15 16:53:35 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.