Re: Poor performance in windows. Switching back to CVS

On 2/14/07, Jing Xue <jxue01@digizenstudio.com> wrote:
>
> I for one wouldn't care to debate on whether not updating the
> timestamp is a user error, but I would argue strongly against paying some
> significant performance penalty just to accommodate it - there may be
> legitimate reasons to do that, but I can't think of any _good_ one.

What about comparing timestamps and filesize - if either differ then the
file must be a candidate yeah? I know this is still a long way from
perfect, but it would cover most of the cases that people are concerned
about.

cheers
dim
Received on Wed Feb 14 22:56:45 2007