Re: Poor performance in windows. Switching back to CVS
From: Talden <talden_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-02-13 22:21:58 CET
Knowing the filename doesn't mean you know where it is on the disk.
'find' from a file-system point of view means resolving a
NTFS, I've heard, is known to suffer with very large numbers of files
-- Talden On 2/14/07, Jeff Smith <jsmith@robotronics.com> wrote: > On Monday 12 February 2007 15:01, Talden wrote: > > PS: At which point does ext3 begin to suffer for having too many > > revision files in the FSFS back-end? IE an update or a checkout > > has to find these by name - surely even in ext3 finding the > > appropriate file is a function of the number of files. I ask this > > because initial smaller, more manageable cvs2svn converts suggest a > > full conversion will yield upwards of 60,000+ revisions - should I > > be considering BDB? > > > > -- > > Talden > > Interresting question... what do you mean by "find", does it not > already know the path? > > I think that so long as the file system itself handles that many files > (for example not running out of inodes), then the only thing is more > files take longer to read and process. That should be expected, and > no version control system would be unaffected by the increase. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Tue Feb 13 22:22:29 2007 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.