Re: Poor performance in windows. Switching back to CVS

On Tuesday 13 February 2007 02:31, Jan Hendrik wrote:
> Well, is it really to be considered a user error?  There are more
> than one apps out there that deliberately or by user's choice do
> not touch the timestamp on search&replace operations for one or
> other reason.

Shoot... are we trying to make svn perform faster, or grind the
process to a halt??

Can you imagine the increased _drag___ if svn were supposed to assume
that every timestamp were meaningless, and have to compare entire
contents instead? That would be horrendous! I say if you haven't got
valid timestamps (especially for large number of files), you haven't
got version control.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Feb 13 21:53:58 2007