Re: Poor performance in windows. Switching back to CVS

Talden schrieb:
> On 2/13/07, Marcus Rohrmoser <mrohrmoser@gmx-gmbh.de> wrote:
>> Hi Joaquim,
>>
>> Joaquim Oliveira schrieb:
>> > 10323 files and 2420 directories (117 MB). We made some tests using a
>>
>> that's quite a lot for a single project.
>
> Heh. If that's quite a lot we have bigger problems.

I considered that as big from my point of view only. There sure are bigger projects that svn handles
quite well - especially compared to CVS and over slow networks. There were some threads in the past
about pushing svn to it's limits with lots of files and/or huge files.

> PS: At which point does ext3 begin to suffer for having too many
> revision files in the FSFS back-end?

I didn't hear of any advantage of BDB over FSFS here recently. There was a discussion about running
out of inodes some time ago. Thought it was here, but a quick search got me
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2005-10/0264.shtml.

I'd start with FSFS and switch to BDB later if necessary.

Greetings,
        M