[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Re: Poor performance in windows. Switching back to CVS

From: Rob van Oostrum <rob.vanoostrum_at_blastradius.com>
Date: 2007-02-12 22:53:44 CET

One thing I've seen done is to give each developer their own NFS share
on a Linux/Unix box, either the same machine that runs your SVN server
or something more dedicated. That way, you can develop on Windows by
mounting your share as a drive, and you can leverage the Unix/Linux
performance advantages of the SVN client by keeping an SSH session open
for that purpose.

R.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcus Rohrmoser [mailto:mrohrmoser@gmx-gmbh.de]
> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 3:18 PM
> To: users@subversion.tigris.org
> Cc: Joaquim Oliveira
> Subject: Re: Poor performance in windows. Switching back to CVS
>
> Hi Joaquim,
>
> Joaquim Oliveira schrieb:
> > 10323 files and 2420 directories (117 MB). We made some tests using
a
>
> that's quit a lot for a single project. I think as long as you don't
> change to a quicker filesystem or split the project into handier
pieces
> svn won't make you happy.
>
> Bye the way - how long takes a typical (commandline) svn update? svn
> status?
>
> Greetings,
> M
>
> P.S.: Just to be curious, how long takes Eclipse without svn to start
> and to refresh?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Feb 12 22:54:25 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.