At 13:28 2007-01-30, Les Mikesell wrote:
>Oliver Betz wrote:
>
>>>Sorry, but most people would chose a revision control system that
>>>will handle the job they need to do, not choose their job based on
>>>what their revision control system happens to make convenient for them.
>>You missed the point.
>
>What point? That his text usage is limited to a small set of tools?
>There is no universal agreement on how text should be handled.
>
>>SVN can not protect "flawed" tools from the reality in any situation.
>
>The reality is that text is represented differently on different
>platforms. For some specific uses you can pretend that isn't true
>and for some you can't. A revision control system that works
>cross-platform should be able to deal with native formats, and
>subversion does - it could just be improved.
I think we all agree with your last statement, I for one just can't
figure out what the f***k you're arguing about.
you seem to flinch every time someone says a tool is broken.
>--
> Les Mikesell
> lesmikesell@gmail.com
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jan 31 05:11:06 2007