Re: High Availability Recommendation
From: Justin Johnson <justinjohnson_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-01-29 22:31:55 CET
On 1/29/07, Johnathan Gifford <jgifford@wernervas.com> wrote:
Good idea. That takes away much of the hassle of keeping the two
> I'm not a Solaris expert, but you may be able to have both servers NFS mount the repository drive at the same time and the Apache instances on both servers running at the same time. If you have a load balancer, you could utilize both servers at the same time. That way all resources are always active instead of one waiting to take over. There were some issues with NFS in versions earlier than Subversion 1.3.x, but that may have been taken care of now if you use the FSFS repository format (which is default).
I am using FSFS. I was planning on having the filesystem mounted on
>
svnsync is on my list of things to look into. I wanted to make sure
Justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.