[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: What do you Hate about Subversion?

From: Erik Huelsmann <ehuels_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-01-29 08:49:48 CET

On 1/29/07, Daniele P. <daniele@interline.it> wrote:
> On Sunday 28 January 2007 22:06, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> > Some operations, like commits, are atomic. If any part of the commit
> > fails, the entire commit fails. This is good.
> >
> > Other operations, like updates, are not atomic. If the update fails
> > part of the way through -- for example because of temporary network
> > problems -- part of the working copy is updated, and part of it is
> > not. This is not ideal, but in many circumstances is not a big deal:
> > just run the update again.
> This remember me what I don't really like about Subversion:
> $ svn rm a
> D a
> $ svn cp b a
> svn: 'a' is scheduled for deletion; it must be committed before it can be
> overwritten
This has been fixed in 1.4.



To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jan 29 08:50:21 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.