Adrian Howard wrote:
>
> On 24 Jan 2007, at 11:37, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> [snip]
>> The example that bothered me was the "info" command. Compare "svn
>> help info"
>> to http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.1/re13.html
>>
>> "svn help info" is way too short and is missing a lot of information.
>> What
>> kinds of details can "svn info" print? Does it access the repository, or
>> just the working files? All this information (and no useless "cruft") is
>> in the aforementioned Web page, which could make a very good manpage, so
>> why not?
> [snip]
>
> I imagine that the "why not" is that the people committing to the book
> already have more than enough to do, and either manually splitting
> stuff out to man files - or figuring out a way of doing it
> automatically - is lower on the priority list than their other tasks.
>
> I'm sure patches would be welcome :-)
>
> Adrian
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
The book is already seperated into individual pages.
(http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.ref.svn.c.status.html)
Now to automate that to feed into the source <G>
Brad Bruce
Received on Wed Jan 24 12:55:35 2007