Maybe the big implementation issue is that properties are per-file, but it
would be difficult to implement status tagging in subversion on anything but
a directory basis. What if we could have versioned properties on
directories with a decent query mechanism? This would serve the purpose.
-Steve
On 1/22/07 5:30 PM, "Byron Brummer" <byron.brummer@livenation.com> wrote:
> Daniel Noll wrote:
>> Martins Kemme wrote:
>>> Ok, my point is that adding "tag" functionality will not make
>>> subversion dirty, but will make it better, more supporting various
>>> configuration management processes.
>>
>> Actually the revision number in subversion is the revision number of the
>> repository, so even assuming that you had this "tag" feature, the
>> revision number of the repository would need to increase when you tagged
>> a file, since it represents a change in the repository. :-)
>
> That's why they are called unversioned properties; because they
> *don't* cause the repository revision to change. This feature
> exists now in SubVersion (automatically with author, comment,
> mod date, etc, but you can set your own). What isn't in
> SVN currently is a sane way to make much use of this information.
> You can't report selected on it and you can't update/check out
> to it.
>
> -Byron
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jan 22 23:34:53 2007