Thanks, Matt! After Andy's follow-up I tracked down >
but I appreciate your follow-up none-the-less...
On 1/4/07, Matt Sickler <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> use mod_authz_svn - it allows per-directory access control
> On 1/4/07, M. David Peterson <email@example.com > wrote:
> > Hey Andy,
> > On 1/4/07, Andy Levy <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 1/4/07, M. David Peterson <email@example.com> wrote:
> > > > As per the subject line, and based on both the existing docs, and a
> > > search
> > > > of the list archives, it seems to me that at this point in time,
> > > there is no
> > > > direct way to use SVN ACL's to enforce directory level permissions
> > > without
> > > > using svnserve directly.
> > > >
> > > > Is my research correct?
> > >
> > > You can serve via Apache as well, and get the same level of
> > > permissions.
> > Oh, you can? Is this newer functionality, or have I been mis-reading
> > the docs/threads on the subject?
> > Are you looking at using file:/// access and need the
> > > ACLs there?
> > No, http and https. Is that how you go about it? i.e. Use the file
> > protocol to serve the SVN repository as if it was being served directly from
> > the file system?
> > --
> > /M:D
> > M. David Peterson
> > http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354
M. David Peterson
http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354
Received on Fri Jan 5 10:57:34 2007