[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Bug in svnversion?

From: Matt Sickler <crazyfordynamite_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2006-12-30 01:59:59 CET

Actually, I take that back. B. Smith nailed it

On 12/29/06, Matt Sickler <crazyfordynamite@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think you want 'svn status .'
>
> On 12/29/06, Kevin Hung <cykhung@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > d2 is an svn:external, i.e. d2 is somewhere in the same repository.
> >
> > After changing f2.txt, I run "svnversion ." at the root directory. I
> > expect svnversion to tell me that there is modification but it does not. I
> > did not run svn commit.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/29/06, Ramanathan Muthaiah < rus.cahimb@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have the following directory and file structure.
> > > >
> > > > root -- d1 -- f1.txt
> > > >
> > > > root -- d2 - f2.txt
> > > >
> > > > d1 and d2 are directories. f1 and f2 are files.
> > > >
> > > > d2 is actually an external.
> > > >
> > > > If I make changes to f2.txt and run "svnversion ." at the root
> > > directory, I
> > > > got a revision number without the letter M. I expect the letter M
> > > since I
> > > > make changes to f2.txt.
> > > Could you pls. provide more details ?
> > >
> > > What do you mean "d2 is external" ? is it external to Subversion i.e
> > > not yet part of repository ?
> > >
> > > After changing f2.txt, did you run svnvresion or svn commit ?
> > >
> > > /Ram
> > >
> >
> >
>
Received on Sat Dec 30 02:00:14 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.