[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Ancestry for dummies

From: Brown, Carlton <Carlton.Brown_at_BellSouth.com>
Date: 2006-12-04 23:52:19 CET

So let me boil down the question... in all my testing, I see no
difference in the outcome of merging regardless of whether
--ignore-ancestry is used. The only difference is whether a certain
merge was registered as a modify versus an add, but the content was
exactly the same.

So why does the merge command even have --ignore-ancestry? In what case
would this ever make a meaningful difference? Why isn't
--ignore-ancestry the default?

*****

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers. GA624

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Dec 4 23:53:12 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.