On Nov 16, 2006, at 01:19, Lorenz wrote:
> Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On Nov 15, 2006, at 01:38, Lorenz wrote:
>>
>>> ru_RU.Subversion wrote:
>>>
>>>> A have a trouble. Results of "svn list --verbose" and "svn list --
>>>> verbose *.*"
>>>> shows different filelists. Look at this:
>>>> [...]
>>>> Is this bug or feature?
>>>
>>> "svn list" shows informations about the files in the repository, not
>>> files in the working copy.
>>>
>>> "svn list -v" is equivalent to "svn list -v ." and therefore lists
>>> the contents of the repo folder the working copy was checked out
>>> from.
>>>
>>> "svn list -v *.*" on the other hand will only list information from
>>> the repo for files files that are already in the working copy.
>>
>> False. "svn list" most definitely does operate on the working copy,
>> unless you provide a URL of a repository, in which case it lists the
>> repository.
>
> Well, then I must have missunderstood:
>
> <svn list --help>
>
> list (ls): List directory entries in the repository.
> usage: list [TARGET[@REV]...]
>
> List each TARGET file and the contents of each TARGET directory as
> they exist in the repository. If TARGET is a working copy path, the
> corresponding repository URL will be used. If specified, REV
> determines
> in which revision the target is first looked up.
>
> The default TARGET is '.', meaning the repository URL of the current
> working directory.
>
> </svn list --help>
>
> Doen't that mean, that even if you provide a wc path as target, the
> listed informations are from the corresponding repository location?
Hmm.... <scratches head> No, I guess I misunderstood. I was under the
impression that "svn ls" was a local operation. But it appears not to
be. I just disconnected from the network and "svn ls" no longer
worked. Sorry for the noise...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Nov 16 09:17:08 2006