I know nothing about the performance of per-directory access control, but I
find it hard to believe that any half-decent hardware these days would incur
any significant performance hit from the ssl for the relatively small
requests that you're describing.
my 2c.
cheers
dim
On 11/16/06, Bradley Wagner <bradley.wagner@hannonhill.com> wrote:
>
> Hey, I recently switched from a repository over http:// with no per
> directory access control to one using some complicated per directory
> access control and https://. I've noticed that compared to Apache's
> SVN repository, for example, mine is very slow even to browse in SVN
> Repository Explorer in Eclipse using Subclipse. I'm using the native
> libraries on OS X for Subclipse.
>
> Between the switch to secure http (SSL) and per-dir access controls,
> which would degrade the performance most? Seems like the per-dir
> access control could be pretty slow especially if it has to derive a
> path and parse the config file every time. Is svnperms supposed to be
> a faster mechanism for doing this?
>
> Bradley
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
Received on Thu Nov 16 06:40:29 2006