[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion vs CVS for document files

From: Jeremy Pereira <jeremyp_at_jeremyp.net>
Date: 2006-11-15 16:36:19 CET

On 14 Nov 2006, at 22:06, Les Mikesell wrote:

> On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 13:33 -0800, Tim Hill wrote:
>> I guess it would help to understand the workflow better. You
>> mentioned talking over the phone and people who the document but do
>> not have access to svn or the repository. What is the intended usage
>> here? There is probably some form of tagging that will give you what
>> you want.
>
> I was thinking of the type of document that might be passed around
> and reviewed by a committee of people who don't have direct access
> to the repository and may or may not do any actual revisions to the
> text (returning it to someone to commit) but always need to know if
> the copy they are viewing is current.

I'd be interested to know how a CVS style revision number would be
any better in this instance. You would still need access to the CVS
repository or working copy to determine the rev number.

>
> --
> Les Mikesell
> lesmikesell@gmail.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 15 16:37:16 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.