[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion vs CVS for document files

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2006-11-14 15:21:47 CET

On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 01:38, Tim Hill wrote:
> Actually I think the single rev# is one of the best features of SVN.
> Having used "per-file" rev# systems, which deteriorate into chaos, I
> far prefer the Subversion approach. Plus the fact that, in effect, a
> rev# becomes a changelist.

It makes sense for a 'project'. It doesn't make much sense
for a collection of mostly unrelated files and it is cumbersome
to put each in its own repository.

-- 
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@gmail.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Nov 14 15:24:22 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.