Re: Subversion vs CVS for document files

At 12:01 PM 11/9/2006, Thomas Harold wrote:

<TH>>>>>What doesn't work well (IMO) at the moment is pulling down partial
working copies or deep-selective checkouts. SVN doesn't (yet) offer any
easy way to pull down anything other then full blow project trees into the
local working copy.<<<<<

Right, that and the fact that the rev number for a whole repository is
bumped whenever one file is revised.

I know why this is done and I have no particular problem with it (would
have preferred the option of revving up individual files but it's not a big
deal). But, others on my team are raising holy hell about it and one is
close to flat refusing to use it.

I also prefer to use a single tool for everything but if separate tools do
the job better, I'm not adamantly against the idea.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Nov 9 18:51:07 2006