If LDAP is in u radar, apache has advantage.
On 11/8/06, Garrett Fitzgerald <sarekofvulcan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/8/06, Andy Levy <andy.levy@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 11/8/06, Garrett Fitzgerald <sarekofvulcan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Because of some changes that are coming up soon, we've decided to move
> > > Subversion off my machine onto one of our servers. I'm currently using
> > > SVNServe.exe: would there be any particular benefit to installing
> > > Apache as well? I'm thinking that there wouldn't be, since this
> > > shouldn't be exposed to the outside world, but I'm willing to be
> > > convinced otherwise.
> >
> > If you like svnserve, keep it. Switching to Apache would be beneficial
> > if you already have Apache running on your server, or http will slip
> > through any firewalls/network configs easier than svn://. But it
> > sounds like you aren't in that situation.
>
> That's about what I figured. The machine we're putting it on is an
> internal file server, so no existing Apache installation - it's some
> flavor of Windows.
>
> > > Also, would it be better to sync off this machine, or hotcopy/load?
> >
> > If I were in your shoes (and I hope to be in a couple months), I would
> > take the opportunity to upgrade to SVN 1.4 as well, and do a dump/load
> > cycle to take full advantage of the improved diff algorithm (at least
> > that's my plan when I move/upgrade my SVN server, if it happens).
>
> I'm currently running 1.4.0, but I upgraded in place rather than doing
> a dump/load. I'll definitely take advantage of that: thanks for the
> reminder. :-)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
Received on Thu Nov 9 00:02:14 2006