[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: performance CVS Vs SVN

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2006-11-06 22:19:13 CET

On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 15:27 -0500, surendra M wrote:
> But our build process heavily depends on tags. It'll checkout/update
> all the specified tags and prepares a build file. And if I adopt to
> SVN instead of CVS I may need to change my build process too. How easy
> it is to migrate tags from PVCS/CVS to SVN ? And are we able to
> migrate
> as expected?

That's going to depend on how you set the tags. In CVS, you can
float tags to new locations and always have known names for current
and n-1, n-2, etc. build tags. I don't think there is any equivalent
in SVN so the build process must be told about the tag to use and
some external logging process used to track them.

-- 
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@gmail.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Nov 6 22:20:29 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.