Re: File size limit exceeded when loading a dump file

Thank you Ryan. I installed via "apt-get install Subversion" from the official Ubuntu repositories. I'll look into a compile against APR 1.2 rather than using the pre-built packages. Thanks, Shawn. ----- Original Message ---- From: Ryan Schmidt <subversion-2006d@ryandesign.com> To: Shawn Smiley <ssmiley483@yahoo.com> Cc: users@subversion.tigris.org Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 3:12:56 PM Subject: Re: File size limit exceeded when loading a dump file On Oct 31, 2006, at 13:56, Shawn Smiley wrote: > I'm in the process of migrating my SVN Repositories from a really > old server running Windows 2000 and SVN 1.1 to a newer server > running Ubuntu 6.10 Server and SVN 1.3 (1.4 packages aren't > available yet) > > For one of my repositories I only want to keep the most recent > revision and the various tags that have been defined. So I've done > an svnadmin dump -R5237:5237 > repo1.dump > > This generated a 16GB dump file that I have transferred to the new > server. > > I've created a new SVN 1.3 repository on my Linux server using the > default options (svnadmin create /svn/repo1) and started an import > of the dump file (svnadmin load /svn/repo1 < repo1.dump) > > The import runs fine for awhile and then stops with the error "File > size limit exceeded". > > I've seen several messages in the list serv archive and on Google > about this indicating that it's a problem with the APR0.9 > bindings. I've also seen messages indicating that the newer > versions of SVN are compiled against APR 1.x so I would thing that > this is not quite the same problem. > > So my questions are: > 1. Is SVN 1.3 compiled against the version of APR that has the 2GB > limit? The Subversion team does not distribute any compiled binaries. So, what did you compile it against? Or: what unofficial Subversion binary did you install? As far as I know, all the unofficial binaries available at the download page use APR 0.9. Also, Subversion still ships with APR 0.9. If you want APR 1.2, you probably need to build it yourself. > 2. If not, what else could be causing this problem? >
Received on Tue Oct 31 21:25:06 2006