[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 'svn co' stats: fsfs 50% faster than bdb?!?

From: Thomas Harold <tgh_at_tgharold.com>
Date: 2006-10-23 16:04:27 CEST

Alexis Huxley wrote:
> I ran some loops checking out approx. 15000 files over a LAN from both
> a BDB repository and an FSFS repository populated from the same dump,
> using 1.4 client and server.
> I also compared protocols svn://, svn+ssh://, http:// and https://.
> The repository is on local mirrored SCSI disks. The working copy was
> on local mirrored SCSI disks (on a different machine). The files are
> C, C++, shell scripts, a few MS Word docs; part of the normal mix of
> development files and support docs for a large project.

What file system was used for the FSFS storage? I'd imagine that the #
of folders in the db/revs folder could cause issues on some file systems?

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Oct 23 16:05:41 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.