[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: remote site dev: single repository vs mirror repos

From: Tim Liu \(gangliu\) <gangliu_at_cisco.com>
Date: 2006-10-18 18:30:25 CEST

Subversion 1.4 has svnsync. Does it support option #2?



-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Schmidt [mailto:subversion-2006d@ryandesign.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 6:22 PM
To: Tim Liu (gangliu)
Cc: users@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Re: remote site dev: single repository vs mirror repos

On Oct 17, 2006, at 16:24, Tim Liu (gangliu) wrote:

> I am investigating subversion repository strategy for remote site
> developement. Please share u experience/opinions. very appreciate it.
> 2 choices:
> 1. One way is to have a single repository. All developers in
> different geographic sites will access it via either Apache or
> svnserver.
> 2. The second way is to have mirror repository in different sites
> and syncup (2 ways both read/write) among them.
> Which way is widely used in remote site dev among subversion users?
> Assume network bandwidth is not a issue. it is high-speed.
> I can see #1 is easier to manage but performance may be a concern
> #2 maybe look like performance is good.

It's very easy: Subversion does not provide option #2, so you must use
option #1.

If you want to try option #2, look into SVK, which is based on
Subversion and should support that.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Oct 18 18:31:27 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.