Subversion 1.4 has svnsync. Does it support option #2?
Thx
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Schmidt [mailto:subversion-2006d@ryandesign.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 6:22 PM
To: Tim Liu (gangliu)
Cc: users@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Re: remote site dev: single repository vs mirror repos
On Oct 17, 2006, at 16:24, Tim Liu (gangliu) wrote:
> I am investigating subversion repository strategy for remote site
> developement. Please share u experience/opinions. very appreciate it.
>
> 2 choices:
>
> 1. One way is to have a single repository. All developers in
> different geographic sites will access it via either Apache or
> svnserver.
> 2. The second way is to have mirror repository in different sites
> and syncup (2 ways both read/write) among them.
>
> Which way is widely used in remote site dev among subversion users?
> Assume network bandwidth is not a issue. it is high-speed.
>
> I can see #1 is easier to manage but performance may be a concern
>
> #2 maybe look like performance is good.
It's very easy: Subversion does not provide option #2, so you must use
option #1.
If you want to try option #2, look into SVK, which is based on
Subversion and should support that.
http://svk.bestpractical.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Oct 18 18:31:27 2006