On 10/5/2006 11:34 AM, Giulio Troccoli wrote:
> Thanks Erik, it is however a bit confusion that delete is recursive by
> default and revert is not. Oh well, maybe it's only me who's confused by
> it.
The principle is that delete is less dangerous, because it's reversible.
Once you revert a file the changes in it are gone forever.
Duncan Murdoch
>
> Anyway it worked and now I know this is the correct behaviour and the
> correct way to use the revert command.
>
> Giulio
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Huelsmann [mailto:ehuels@gmail.com]
> Sent: 05 October 2006 16:31
> To: Giulio Troccoli
> Cc: users@subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: Re: Reverting schedule-deleted items
>
> That's correct: you didn't ask svn to: the revert command is by
> default *not* recursive. You probably wanted 'svn revert -R
> dip/dscomms'.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Oct 5 17:43:22 2006