But it's not "just for the sake of implementing it" - I (and others)
used the feature! I'll look into svn externals as Mark Phippard
suggested. Thanks folks!
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Andy Levy [mailto:andy.levy@gmail.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 9:03 AM
>To: Fouts Christopher (QNA RTP PT PREV)
>Cc: users@subversion.tigris.org
>Subject: Re: Re: Subversion modules?
>
>On 9/6/06, Chris.Fouts@qimonda.com <Chris.Fouts@qimonda.com> wrote:
>> Ok, chalk this one to Subversion's intentionally missing
>features too!
>
>Or intentionally not implementing something "just for the sake
>of implementing it" because there are
>other/different/better/more flexible ways of doing things by
>not locking into another product's philosophy.
>
>> My use case: Part of our repository are our test cases. So when we
>> developers check it out, we check out everything. However, when we
>> distribute our code, we don't want to include the test case dir
>> structure. I know an alternative will be to store the test cases in
>> their own repository.
>
>Or keep the test cases in a different location in the same repository.
>Or have your process that creates the distribution package
>remove the test cases before packaging.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 6 15:24:02 2006