AW: RE: Keeping last-modified dates
From: Felix Gilcher <gilcher_at_exozet.com>
Date: 2006-08-29 19:00:32 CEST
Steve Fairhead <mailto:steve@fivetrees.com> schrieb am Dienstag, 29. August 2006 18:18:
> Greg Thomas said:
No, she did neither throw away any changes nor did she revert to an older version. It just happens that the newer version of foo.c was commited bevore she did a build in her working copy. After that she made an svn update, retrieving the newest version of foo.c but as it gets Bobs last-modified date the file is "older" than the compiled version, breaking the contract that "make" relies on. The way subversion behaves now, Alice would get a modification time of 08/04/2006 which honors the contract that make relies on (modified source files are supposed to be newer than the compiled versions).
Running a "make clean" for every build is only possible where build times are small enough or it will impact your productiveness.
>
felix
-- Felix Gilcher Head of IT Development Exozet Berlin GmbH Rotherstraße 20 10245 Berlin eMail: gilcher@exozet.com URL: www.exozet.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Tue Aug 29 19:43:48 2006 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.