[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: RE: Perforce versus Subversion

From: Reedick, Andrew <Andrew.Reedick_at_BellSouth.com>
Date: 2006-08-22 17:00:14 CEST

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arild Fines [mailto:arild.fines@broadpark.no]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 10:49 AM
> To: 'Kenneth Porter'; users@subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: RE: Perforce versus Subversion
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kenneth Porter [mailto:shiva@sewingwitch.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 12:27 AM
> > To: users@subversion.tigris.org
> > Subject: Perforce versus Subversion
> >
> > A coworker pointed out this document on the Perforce website:
> >
> >
> From the PDF:
> >> Subversion 1.3
> >> * Running a full branch on same files 4m 3.119s
> Eh. How did they manage to spend 4 minutes doing a branch with

        They branched in a workset instead of on the server? (Lies,
damn lies, and statistics...)
        Or maybe the discovered that Subversion can run on a 286 intel


The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers. AL621

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Aug 22 17:15:47 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.