Re: Perforce versus Subversion
From: Kenneth Porter <shiva_at_sewingwitch.com>
Date: 2006-08-22 05:56:15 CEST
Their document contains a table comparing aspects of Subversion to
> Branching and merging: Subversion offers branching, but requires
True. Subversion's merge tracking is in the conceptual planning stage:
<http://subversion.tigris.org/merge-tracking/>
> Platform dependencies: Compatibility issues exist with line ending of
False. Subversioned files have an optional line ending property that's used
<http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/
> Distributed development: No performance solutions for remote
False. Subversion was designed for efficient use over a wide-area network,
> Scalability and performance: Limited due to file binary diff
Unknown. [Seeking developer input.]
> Defect tracking: Not part of Subversion; need to use a separate defect
True. Multiple solutions are available. Trac is well-regarded:
> Integration with related tools: Integrations are available via the
True. Integration with Windows Explorer is available through TortoiseSVN.
<http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/>
> Support: Available at additional cost from a third party.
True. But note that the base cost is zero. So you only pay for support, not
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.