Ah, got it. Operative Revision is determined by the -r specification. I
guess that makes sense. I had thought a revision defined the repository at
a point in time completely. When dealing with copies and branches that
isn't necessarily the case especially in a re-branch case. Thanks...
On 7/19/06, Peter Kahn <email@example.com> wrote:
> By using the -r I am specifing the revision. It should be the same as the
> @ shouldn't it?
> A merge specifiying the range also fails.
> svn merge -r101:103 svn:.... workspace
> On 7/18/06, Reedick, Andrew <Andrew.Reedick@bellsouth.com> wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Peter Kahn [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> > >
> > > In r100 I created the branch foo
> > > In r110 I deleted the branch foo
> > > In r111 I recreated the branch foo
> > >
> > >
> > > Now, I can access history from r100-r109 for the branch foo, but I
> > cannot cat or copy from the branch foo in that range. I was under the >
> > impression that I should be able to do so.
> > >
> > > am I missing something?
> > svn log foo@100
> > And read up on 'Peg and Operative Revisions' in the Advanced Topics
> > chapter in the svn book.
> > *****
> > The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> > which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or
> > privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use
> > of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or
> > entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
> > this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all
> > computers. 162
> Peter Kahn
> email@example.com, pkahnpie1@AIM , skype: citizenkahn
> http://kahnstipation.blogspot.com |
> Awareness - Intention - Action
firstname.lastname@example.org, pkahnpie1@AIM, skype: citizenkahn
http://kahnstipation.blogspot.com | http://analogoustendencies.blogspot.com/
Awareness - Intention - Action
Received on Wed Jul 19 18:13:47 2006