Re: subversion client scalability (was Re: subversion 1.3.1 + apr 0.9.7 = memory leak?)

On 6/13/06, David Young <dyoung@pobox.com> wrote:

> This email, bumping issue 2167 from milestone 1.4 to 1.5, crossed my desk
> a while ago. 2167 is an aging report on facets of the client scalability
> problem discussed in this thread. I was startled by the bump. Is there
> a consensus in the Subversion leadership that the client's scalability
> should be a lower priority than before?

No, there is a consensus among the developers who took it upon
themselves to do issue triage following the branching for the 1.4
release (i.e. lundblad) that this issue was not actually solved in the
1.4 release, that it was not significant enough to hold back the
release, so it was bumped to 1.5. This is at exactly the same
priority it was at before, it's a bug, and should be fixed, but nobody
is currently working on it.

Personally, I think he was right. It would certainly be nice to solve
this problem, but it's possible to avoid it by working with smaller
trees, and nobody who needs to use larger trees has stepped up and
solved the problem.

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jun 14 00:26:54 2006