[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: "default" repository fs-type?

From: <mutsuura_at_mutsuura.com>
Date: 2006-04-29 13:50:03 CEST

I apologize but I had my gmail filter set to 'delete' temporarily and missed
the replies to my most. <:-(

If someone could resend the response(s) - I'd appreciate it.

Thx Attila

On 4/29/06, Andy Levy <andy.levy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/29/06, Attila Horvath <mutsuura@mutsuura.com> wrote:
> > All
> >
> > I'm using CYGWIN's subversion 1.3.0.
> >
> > "svnadmin help create" says that the default repository type is FSFS,
> yet
> > Ben Collins-Sussman SVN book (rev 2118) says:
> >
> > "In Subversion 1.0, a Berkeley DB repository is always created. In
> > Subversion 1.1, a Berkeley DB repository is the default repository type,
> > but an FSFS repository can be created using the --fs-type option:
> > $ svnadmin create /usr/local/svn/repos --fs-type fsfs"
> > Which is the 'truth'? Or to be more specific, how do I find out what
> type
> > of repository I have? I did not specify "--fs-type" when I created my
> > repositories.
>
> If you are the same Attila Horvath who posted this question yesterday,
> please read the replies to that post. You posted from your GMail
> account.
>
>
Received on Sat Apr 29 13:51:02 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.