[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: How Subversion drove me to shoot myself in the foot.

From: L. Wayne Johnson <wayne_at_zk.com>
Date: 2006-04-18 19:08:26 CEST

>"the book reassured me quite nicely that "svn delete" never actually
>deletes anything" which is, of course, not true...

If you read your quote from the book you'll see that subversion behaved
exactly as the book indicated it would:

>The command will not remove any unversioned or modified items;
>use the --force switch to override this behavior.

Note that using the --force flag over-rides the stated behavior

>The problem was that at the point 'svn delete' was run,
>those files were versioned.

>From the original post it appears to me that the problem was the the --force
flag was used to override the behavior. I do not believe that any files were
committed:

'So "svn --force delete" and then start again.'

I doubt there is any history since the commit failed because of the missing
files. The svn rever <missing file name> would have fixed the problem. The
'revert' command requires explicit arguments...

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 18 19:12:04 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.