[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Recommended Subversion Repository Structure

From: Blair Zajac <blair_at_orcaware.com>
Date: 2006-03-24 17:42:27 CET

On Mar 24, 2006, at 8:19 AM, Jay Lessik wrote:

> I'm new to subversion so forgive me if this question
> is newbie-ish...
>
> I know that project repository structure has been
> discussed on this list and I've read a lot of the
> posts, but I wasn't able to find a clear answer to the
> question of which of the following is better?
>
> repository/
> projectA/
> trunk/
> branches/
> tags/
> projectB/
> trunk/
> branches/
> tags/
>
> OR...
>
> repository/
> trunk/
> projectA/
> projectB/
> branches/
> projectA/
> projectB/
> tags/
> projectA/
> projectB/

I had the later structure for a while at http://www.orcaware.com/svn/
repos/ but I reorganized the repository to the first. It's just odd
having your trunk separated from its branches and tags that far in
the repository, especially when the different projects are not
related. So I recommend going for the first.

You can see everything related that one project in the project*
directory without having to go into other locations. It's also nice
for browsing.

Regards,
Blair

-- 
Blair Zajac, Ph.D.
<blair@orcaware.com>
Subversion training, consulting and support
http://www.orcaware.com/svn/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Mar 24 17:43:27 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.