Resend to user group:
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> The far likelier cause of file loss is operator error, not disk
> failure in my experience, and it's a lot easier to recover the files
from
> a read-only repository.
Interesting. Are you saying it is possible for an operator to corrupt a
checked in version such that you can't use the main repository to get
the file? If so, is it more likely to happen with bdb or FSFS?
Ralph Navarro
Cell..: 508-287-0190
Email.: RNavarro@iperia.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Nico Kadel-Garcia [mailto:nkadel@comcast.net]
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 2:24 PM
To: Michael Goettsche; users@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Re: Recommendation for Solaris 10 verses Linux & RAID for
Subversion Server?
Michael Goettsche wrote:
> Unless your Subversion server will be *extremely* busy or the data
> safey is extremely critical you shouldn't need anything other than
> RAID 1. The probability of two disks crashing at the same time is
> very low and in that case you would still have your nightly backups.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Best Regards,
> Michael Goettsche
> svn-hosting.com - Professional Subversion and Trac Hosting
I tend to throw out the RAID, and use a nightly disk mirror on the
second
disk. The far likelier cause of file loss is operator error, not disk
failure in my experience, and it's a lot easier to recover the files
from a
read-only repository.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Mar 20 16:32:29 2006